Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
I was just trying to give Gross a fair shake based on historical data, but with SPX at 800 I'm not looking for further drops to allocate capital. I'm more like Buffett's "oversexed man in a whorehouse".

Starting points for historical analyses are so important (even 100 years worth). Going back and re-reading Graham, I'm reminded that in the 30's and 40's "you could buy the present at a discount and get the future for free." IMO, it would take an unprecedented liquidity failure for that to happen again.

I think there was a lot of fluff in the recent $50 earnings of SPX, so I'm uncertain about $45 for 2003. But there are certainly lots of individual companies that seem dirt cheap right now. And with volatility so high, I'm tempted to use short puts to add to positions in MRK, SWY, SGP, and maybe GMT, PEP & CUM.

I'm a little hesitant to rely too heavily on the fed model to justify stocks being cheap (i.e., historically low bond yields), because you know the problem with ratio variables. It isn't always what's happening in the numerator.

Todd
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement