Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
I'm not convinced.

I am, the last new nuke built in the US started out with a price tag of $750M. For various reasons by the time they finished it it wound up costing $8B and the plant was smaller than the original design. The situation in the US has gotten worse not better. All other considerations aside one can sum up the arguments against any more nukes in the US in two words "liability insurance"....In Canada the only juristication that could afford the capital investment at this point is Ontario and again, I can sum the impediments to that up in one word "Darlington"...

New technology, smaller, safer local nuclear power plants

Like Darlington? Sorry, there are no great leaps here, there are some incremental improvements possible but not a lot...the CANDU heavy water reactor is, I'm convinced, the safest design in the market but it is less safe than its original design goals. Simple fact of the matter is that what we've learned about nuclear power in Canada since Pickering A was designed in the 60's is that it's a LOT more expensive to build and maintain than we previously thought, and this is getting worse and not better and furthmore it's marginally less safe than we thought it would be...

Print the post  


The Great Foolish North
Canadian social and off-topic banter.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.