Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 11
In 1990 it was

342/1253 = 27%


That's deceptive, Bob. And I'm sure you know it. It's a larger percentage of a smaller number. What does that mean? Not much. The poster you're responding to did an outstanding job of showing that real expenditures went UP. And they went up A LOT. That other expenditures also went up more than inflation, giving you that larger total number, doesn't mitigate the increase in defense spending.

I'm not saying (here) whether that increase was justified or not, simply pointing out that your way of presenting the statistic was specious. (And that's twice this week you've made me use that word! Try to be more transparent, like the other poster was.)

1poorguy
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement