No. of Recommendations: 2
Instead of each state having a different number of votes determined by their representation in congress (our current system), each state gets 1 vote.

This is such a terrible idea I don't know where to begin. How about that each voter vote in Montana would likely be worth 5,000 voter votes in California? Or perhaps that each voter vote in Arizona would be worth 3,000 voter votes in Florida. (Just to keep the example better for the Republicans in one example and for the Democrats in the other.)

I also don't advocate direct election, because that would give virtually all the influence to the large cities, and flawed as it is, the electoral college system gave rise to "battleground" states Tennessee and Ohio, and prompted campaign visits to Maine, Michigan, and Arizona - as well as the obvious pandering to the big population states such as California and New York (and Florida.)

I'm not sure what the answer is, but in the choice between "direct popular election" and "electoral college", I vote for "None of the above."
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.