UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (57) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: ravvt Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 58870  
Subject: Re: Surowiecki on Soc Sec, Medicare Date: 2/3/2013 5:49 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 3
intercst whines: Bush's major policy initiatives were $4 Trillion in tax cuts which largely benefited the rich, and $3 Trillion spent on expensive and embarrassing misadventures in Iraq and Afghanistan, all funded by borrowing from China.

… once again, intercst’s Bush Derangement Syndrome comes into play as he attempts to show a problem /w the Bush tax cuts. He forgets that those tax cuts were so onerous that Urkel chose to extend them completely for 2 additional years because his Porkulus spending bill was running out of gas. The cost of that 2yr extension, which was completely funded by the Chinese and Federal Reserve money printing, added $544 Billion to the national debt.

Bush was a profligate spender …. especially in the period from 2006 – 2008 when the Democrats were in control of Congress … but Bush’s spending pales in comparison to Urkel’s.

Let’s not forget that Urkel has had 4 successive Trillion dollar deficits (so far … more to come) for an economy that came out of recession in June 2009. One or two years of that deficit spending can be blamed on the financial crisis but all of the rest of that excess spending has been a matter of choice by Urkel and the Democrats in Congress …

those choices include: extending the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan for 4 additional years, restarting and extending all of the welfare programs that Clinton had eliminated, and adding innumerable liberal hobby horse spending projects (including tax breaks for Urkel’s favorite campaign donors – the Wall Street banks, wind energy companies, retail & restaurant developers, Hollywood, coal miners, …) and finally an additional $3.4Trillion will be added to the debt because Urkel insisted on extending the Bush tax cuts to the bottom 98% of the income distribution …

So before you blame Bush for the miserable state of the economy, you might want to look carefully at the policies put in place by the Urkel & the Democrats over the past 4 yrs…
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (57) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Post of the Day:
Value Hounds

Medallion Financial: TAXI!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement