No. of Recommendations: 0
Is implementing Romneycare state by state a good idea? Given the issues we have to consider when looking at healthcare, like moving across state lines, pre-existing conditions, etc., it seems like having 50 different sets of health care laws would be wildly inefficient.

It seems that Romney is saying that Romneycare is good because it is only on a state basis. Does this make any sense?

I've long believed that states should not be in charge of health care nor insurance. Possibly for the same reasons you do.

However, there are plans working in 3-4 states now. Not to say they wouldn't be better if residents were free to chose other plans not in state.

But Obamacare ends up being the responsibility of the states in a very large way. States know that, which is why they dread it.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.