Is that why it usually goes up over the long term horizon? As with any equity, the longer the time horizon the more your returns will approximate the change in underlying value of the security and the smaller the effects of temporary over/undervaluation on the dates of purchase and sale.The valuation on dates of purchase and sale are extremely important,but the importance does eventually start to fade.An example.I probably overpaid for my original shares, but only by a small amount.I built my stake in September 2001 at an average cost basis of $64,267.For a sense of scale that was 1.67 times the most recently reported quarterly book of $38,458.As long as I sell those shares at a valuation at least that high my long run return will be at least equal to the change in intrinsic value.That would be $179,430 today based on price/book. Book/share grew9.78%/year compounded in those 11 years, versus 2.82%/year total return for SPY.Unfortunately for me BRK's share price has risen only 6.42%/year since I bought my shares, an exact doubling in almost exactly 11 years.That can be thought of as 9.8%/year in value creation and -3.4%/year in multiple compression.Since I think we can assume the multiple compression is now over, for meit's a one time drop of -24.5%. So the rate of return from here should track the value creation and the one time drag from compression will be a smaller and smaller amount on a per-year-of-share-holding basis.Again assuming multiples never change from here, at the 20 year mark the -24.5% drag will have been only -1.4%/year instead of the current -3.4%/year.Jim
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat