No. of Recommendations: 1
It would violate the constitution. The federal government can't tax assets, but it can tax transactions (egs. earned income, sales, inheritance, dividends). Not paying rent is not a transaction, so the proposed tax would be an ad valorum tax on assets, which is constitutionally reserved for the states.

Not buying health insurance is not a transaction, either, but SCOTUS ruled it was constitutional to tax that.

That was a bit of trickery on the part of Zero. Congress has the power to levy taxes. They specifically can't levy a property tax and the states specifically can, whereas the states specifically can't levy a poll tax. So IIUC, in justifying this travesty of justice now called Obamacare, they levied a poll tax on everyone but waived it for those who had qualifying health insurance or who qualified for Medicaid. That way it's not a tax based on the value of property nor a specific transaction, it's a poll tax. But they did have to admit that it was a tax.

Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.