Its intersting, I down loaded the Gotham report but haven't dug through it yet.I'd dig thru it if I were you. If you've invested in this company, I'd be curious to know whether you have any counterarguments to some of the very serious criticisms brought up in the report.Consider:-audited by KPMG, switched to Anderson in 1999, with highly creative accounting-misleading statements in press releases and earnings statements-risky investments in farm loans with generous conditions-inadequate capital reserving for bad loans, compared with other lenders-mismatch of long-term assets with short-term obligations, with potential for credit crunch-Enron-style round trip loans and guarantees with off-balance sheet entities-conflicts of interest in board of directors-abusive insider remuneration, particularly with stock options-mistakenly identified by Bloomberg as AAA rating by Moody's, recently corrected to NR=not ratedAnd all this, trading at rather high multiples to reported 'earnings'. It sounds to me like it's about as egregious an example of a stock to avoid as one could dream up. I would think it would be hard to invent a better prospect for disaster.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat