Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
JABoa writes (in part):

Don't hold your breath, Bob. It took a lot of prodding to get Peter Thelander's article acknowledged, and even then Fool HQ attributed it to Roy in some blurb. There have been other examples.

I reply:

I remember that, but when I pointed out the blurb to Roy here on the boards, he acknowledged the error almost immediately. I don't understand why it took so long to correct the blurb, but eventually they did; I certainly don't lay that at Roy's feet.

On the other hand, this article has his by-line. It's possible that he acknowledged my contribution and some Fool editor excised the reference, but the bottom line is, what appears under his name is his responsibility. So I think I'm entitled to an explanation, and probably an apology.

As to your legal point, as far as I know, it's correct. In fact, it would be correct even without the legal boilerplate; you can't copyright an idea, and in the final analysis, the "Shore sale" is an idea. For me, the issue is intellectual honesty, and that's why I'm raising a fuss. --Bob
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.