Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread
Author: dory36 Three stars, 500 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 19380  
Subject: Re: 5 Year "Cushion" Date: 4/28/2000 12:15 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
Jangle1 wrote I've let this lay dorment for a while now, but I just read the FoolU Q&A on assett allocation and there the advise is to have 3 to 6 months of cash and the rest 100% in stocks. This seems to be 180 degrees from your position of 5 years of cash.

I can suggest one resolution of this apparent inconsistency. In short, the 3-6 month reserve is to get you through until you get a new job. The 5 year cushion assumes you aren't getting a new job.

A little elaboration:

The goal is to have enough cash on hand to meet any likely emergency, or last until income is restored, without having to liquidate other assets at "fire sale" prices or inopportune times.

Why 3-6 months? At least according to one old rule of thumb, that was about how long it would take the "typical" person to find an equivalent new job, in "typical" economic conditions. (Monster.com and low unemployment haven't always been with us.)

The 3-6 months is for when the paycheck comes in every month and is reasonably expected to continue. If you know your income will stop in a few months, and you don't expect another paycheck for a year, you'd certainly try to build up at least a year's cash before putting more into the third world growth fund you've been paying into each month. If the delay is three years, you'd build up a lot more.

At some point, it no longer makes sense to have all your reserve in cash, and you can start taking the chance that the illiquid investments, or those with price volatility, can be sold at a good price within the "lifespan" of the reserve fund.

This is where the retiree finds himself -- no anticipated paycheck, ever again.

In looking back over many years of investment returns, market crashes, inflation, and so forth, it looks like about five years of living expenses in cash and about twenty years of income in stocks would have been the best single mix to weather all of the different situations that occurred in the past 100+ years.

Dory36
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread

Announcements

Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Post of the Day:
Apple

Wal-Mart Nixes Apple Pay
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement