Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread
Author: JustMee01 Big red star, 1000 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 27420  
Subject: Re: Valuation Question - Growth / Acquisition Date: 10/19/2012 6:29 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Jared,

I haven't gone though the previous annual reports to hunt for goodwill charges, but the 2011 annual report indicated that their acquisitions didn't indicate impairment and were valued over what they paid. I guess this means that on some level they are acquiring and managing the acquisition process well????

Don't confuse goodwill with over or underpaying. Goodwill is just a balance sheet issue. When they cram the two companies' balance sheets together, any money paid above the book value of the company has to go to go on as something. So, they put it on as goodwill.

A company can sell for much, much more than its book value and still be a great purchase. Some companies are asset light and have a lot of intangible value. A software company might be an example. Much of their IP won't show up on the sheets. Another example might be a cash producer that's asset light. It's cash flow might justify a much bigger number than its book value. So, don't look at goodwill as a bad thing, necessarilly. For some companies and some acquisitions, book value is pretty unimportant. You're right though, that later impairments of goodwill are a bad indicator.

The focus on good or bad is more complex. You really need to step back and take a look at the bigger picture: why they bought the acquisition, what they anticipated it would provide, and if that outcome came through as expected. Some companies are very good at repeatedly scoring good buys and driving growth that way.

On the flip side of the negative, they can probably buy up companies on the cheap if they are not positioned well or have the balance sheet to handle the ups and downs. Thoughts?

Exactly. That's what Berkshire does. They pair their high cash flow insurance businesses with old economy businesses that are very profitable when protected by Berkie's balance sheet. A company with large capital needs can get buried by debt, since their cost of capital is becomes too high. Berkshire's cost of capital is low, so they can funnel cash to those subsidiaries and make them more profitable than they would be on their own. And of course, with that strong balance sheet they can bail out weaker companies or buy them outright when the economy is down.

Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread

Announcements

Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

2.1: The Labor Pool Problem
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement