Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Jim, do you or you wife have any thoughts?

A fast newtonian will give you coma error for off-axis images. How much of a problem this is depends on what you want to do. For deep sky faint images you'll never notice it. Looking at things like open clusters, it will be quite visible. For planetary observations, you will probably want to mask it down.

I think I would pay more attention to the mounts (both scope mount and mirror mount) than anything else (after, of course, selecting aperture). For equal $$ I would probably go smaller aperture to get a better mount. Of course, the ideal is to get the biggest aperture you can (you can always mask it if you need to), but a shakey mount or an unreliable mirror mount will ruin the experience.

The scope we have here is a 9" Schmidt-Cassegrain reflector.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement