No. of Recommendations: 2

I did a search as you mentioned and came up with this post from 2009 which is his most recent mentioning 'elqw.v'.

This excerpt would indicate that elq.v is the regularized 'elqw.v'.

Already Regularized Fields

Two fields are already regularized: elq.v and rce.v. For discussion of the irregularities in elq.v, see ; for rce.v (and the demolition of SOS_Ancer), see .

Note that I have removed the 'w' from elqw.v, which means some screen URLs will require slight changes. I have also changed the way I regularize the field: I've scrapped the convoluted procedure for recovering values outside the currently accepted range from of -300% and 300%, and instead, I zero-out values outside this range from 1986 through 1996, leaving the field consistently within the range of -300% to 300% over the entire length of the backtest. I also set the field to zero whenever eslq.v is not positive, consistent with Value Line's current practice.

I must admit,however, I do not always (or even often) understand what Robbie is saying. I just do not function at his wave length.

Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.