Just as"Spending a lifetime repeating empty rhetoric like "taxes are sharing or contributions" and "social security is a sign of a generous public" 460,000 times because Move-on.org or CNN or CBS thought it made a good sound bite and repeated it till his sock puppets took it as fact, is just plain sad.Maybe this is the difference. I plugged the phrases into Google. Here are the results:"Your search - "taxes are sharing or contributions" - did not match any documents. (Zero hits)Your search - "social security is a sign of a generous public" - did not match any documents. (Zero hits)Oh, for "Social Security is a ponzi scheme"? 62,300 hits.Maybe you can find the rhetoric like "taxes are sharing or contributions", or "Social Security is a sign of a generous public". I couldn't. I'm willing to bet that you can't either, and that you are - as usual - just flapping your lips to see if you can make the air move. Why not provide a link and prove me wrong?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat