Just my opinion, but I think the credibility of both the movie and you are questionable.By the way, the congressional report you cite is a preliminary finding. The investigation was dropped before everyone could be interviewed and all the evidence examined. I think it highly irresponsible and intellectually dishonest for you to assume a preliminary report to be the gospel truth simply because of your bias against scientists and religious agenda.The report was complete when published:http://souder.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Issues.View&Issue_id=4E950503-19B9-B4B1-12EF-526CDA4C8585In December 2006, my subcommittee staff completed an investigation of bias at the Smithsonian Institution and released a report entiteld: "Intolerance and the Politicization of Science at the Smithsonian Institution." The report concluded that the Smithsonian's leadership permitted the harrassment and demotion of Dr. Richard v. Sternberg, a Research Associate at the National Museum of Natural History, because he allowed publication of an article favoring the theory of Intelligent Design in Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, a peer-reviewed biology journal published by the Biological Society of Washington.No more insults from you, please. I don't deserve them.Paul
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra