Show Latest Posts:

The 10 Most Recent Messages By SkepikI

Take me back to where I was.
  • Date: 5/26/16 6:05 PM
  • Number: 3233
  • Recommendations: 1
Many of these operations have had non fossil energy operations in their portfolios for decades. They have just been very tiny in comparison to their fossil operation. Chevron has for instance had Geothermal interests since the late 80's at
(Continued...)
  • Date: 5/22/16 9:19 AM
  • Number: 3225
  • Recommendations: 0
Now why would anyone be skeptical (except me ;-D) about the sustainability of sneakers? What could be more important in the world than sustainable SPORTING GOODS that are fashionable, trendy, and sustainable..... Perhaps the "sustainable"
(Continued...)
  • Date: 5/5/16 8:12 PM
  • Number: 3214
  • Recommendations: 0
Thanks for that. This seems like a "first" to me in these pages...er...pixels... ahh....electrons... A clear definable, traceable and articulated METRIC based evaluation-brought to our attention in an information based way. A fair bit
(Continued...)
  • Date: 4/28/16 7:27 PM
  • Number: 3207
  • Recommendations: 0
We have decades of experience with all those things. And still we have various nimrods torching themselves and their homes and blowing stuff up.... There is something like a century of experience with lead acid batteries and the USN submarine
(Continued...)
  • Date: 4/28/16 11:35 AM
  • Number: 3205
  • Recommendations: 1
Of course it "can". Strictly a matter of economics and risk. If my total electric bill is $100/mo or about 1200 a year, (very close)would I invest 35,000 every 10 years plus oh another 20,000 every 20 years for cells? Perhaps if I am a
(Continued...)
  • Date: 4/24/16 1:55 PM
  • Number: 3203
  • Recommendations: 0
Well, lets put it to the test and drop the subsidies!!!!

Unfortunately, if you read the article closely, the figures for Solar are for "utility scale thin film" technology. This has yet to be proven and verified in life cycle at
(Continued...)
  • Date: 4/16/16 7:43 PM
  • Number: 3177
  • Recommendations: 0
And you believe Solar and Wind are immune from similar "social costs"?

There are some interesting abandoned solar sites in the Mojave and abandoned wind towers in S. California passes you might find scenic
  • Date: 4/15/16 11:35 PM
  • Number: 3172
  • Recommendations: 0
Unfortunately, these kinds of evaluations seem to me to be mostly after the fact. I saw no useful numerical facts or statistics in the WSJ article. Can you point me at one particular or several citations of specific prediction prior to negative
(Continued...)
  • Date: 4/12/16 11:31 PM
  • Number: 3169
  • Recommendations: 0
And, so I must ask since no DATA is forthcoming- WHAT? exactly is heroine Minnow's correlation with results? Or any of this for that matter.... can I as an investor peer into her or anyone's pronouncements or dare I say it PREDICTIONS... and find
(Continued...)
  • Date: 4/4/16 12:12 PM
  • Number: 3157
  • Recommendations: 0
Doggonne it, now I wish I had taken a picture and saved it of the oversize flatbed truck hauling a wind turbine blade down I-84 in the Columbia gorge belching black diesel exhaust, to build a "renewable, emission-free" wind farm. A pic
(Continued...)
Show Latest Posts:
Total = 10

Take me back to where I was.
Stock Folders: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z