If one were, say, a 78 year old woman in good health and one had to invest half a million dollars in something SAFE but which returned better than bank interest, say, if possible, 5%, where would be a good place to do that?Suppose this woman has an inherant distrust of the stock market in general.Tax free munis? Those are fairly low risk, right? And fairly liquid?Ma might be selling some real estate this year.
If one were, say, a 78 year old woman in good health and one had to invest half a million dollars in something SAFE but which returned better than bank interest, say, if possible, 5%, where would be a good place to do that?Suppose this woman has an inherant distrust of the stock market in general.Tax free munis? or highly rated corporate bonds ..if this is her only income, thetas-free is mostly irrelevantThose are fairly low risk, right?yes ..'fairly' --and they can be 'insured' --but quick look at mybroker says -- to get 5%, you have to buy 30yr bondsand at lower ratings (A..AA-) And fairly liquid?dunnovalue will vary with market,and lots of munis are callable
Ma might be selling some real estate this year. Does she need the income ? How much ?
Life is full of trade offs -- and investing with the desires you posted means you must, make trade offs.Here is the real rub -- the Fed is currently holding interest rates very low -- they are less than inflation and that is intentional to continue stimulating the economy. That is not going to end if you believe the statements by the Fed until 2014. I don't see interest rates rising significantly until we start to have some inflation - but I have guessed wrong in the past.I am assuming this 78 year old woman does not need more of her $500K than say the mandatory IRA withdraw amount -- that being just under $25K. Assuming that is the case, I would say put $75K in checking account and the rest in Vanguard Wellington. This means worst case, she takes $25K a year out of the bank and leaves the reminder in the mutual fund to ride out any volatility. If these funds really are IRA and she is going to be forced to withdraw, than the $75 should be in a money market of whatever broker handles her investments. (I trust you know you can buy a Vanguard mutual fund without having your account at Vanguard.)If the "distrust" of the stock market trumps all else, but the money in two different checking accounts -- that way it will all be insured by the FDIC. Contrary to what a lot of people believe, bonds have risk -- and today that risk probably larger than mutual funds that invests in large, dividend paying stocks. The only reason I pointed to Wellington instead of some other mutual fund is stock do have inherent volatility. I hope you understand there is a difference in risk (loosing money) and volatility (value of investments going up and down).GordonAtlanta
I think that currently this is just impossible. Tax-free bonds are fine, but some cities have recently gone bankrupt. Others may follow. Now is not the time to go into the stock market.
Tax free bonds might make sense, if there were a reason to avoid taxes. However, tax free bonds generally yield less than taxable.Also, to get any yield approaching 5%, one has to look at junk (more risk).
I think that currently this is just impossible. Tax-free bonds are fine, but some cities have recently gone bankrupt. Others may follow. ?? what is "just impossible"?true that Munis aren't the dead-on certainty they used to be ..but still pretty safe (i seem to recall someone looking up defaults and not finding many)and some are insured
but still pretty safeI think you should qualify that. i.e. they may be quite safe in terms of default risk, but any bond with a maturity more then 5 years out has interest rate risk. GordonAtlanta
I think you should qualify that. i.e. they may be quite safe in terms of default risk, but any bond with a maturity more then 5 years out has interest rate risk. I think you are absolutely right
If one were, say, a 78 year old woman in good health...Two things to determine...One, what is this money to be used for? Live off the interest? Keep safe to pass on to grandchildren? Create a scholarship at alma mater? Blow out kegger for 80th birthday party?Two, life expectancy. Is she older than anyone has ever been in the family? Or do people routinely live to 100? Nothing is for certain but investing for 1 year is different than investing for 20....in something SAFE but which returned better than bank interest, say, if possible, 5%,...Anything outside of treasuries (and I'm beginning to question them) and CDs has risk. You could build a ladder of CDs (FDIC insured) and get 3-4%. If you're wanting more than that, you'll have to take some risks, that means stock market exposure. Personally, I'd look at some MLPs and preferred stocks. That could easily get you in the 5-6+% range. And you wouldn't necessarily have to put it all in the market. Say 1/3 CD ladder 2/3 stocks.JLC
... something SAFE but which returned better than bank interest, say, if possible, 5% ... an inherant distrust of the stock market Let me just reiterate. Right now, these three constraints are darn near impossible to meet at the same time. This means she's going to have to compromise on one of her constraints: safety, 5% return, or no stocks.She's going to have to decide which of these is least important, which is most important, and adjust the constraints accordingly. All of the prior responses made some assumptions about which constraints to change and by how much. But it's really up to your hypothetical healthy 78 year old female to make that decision.--Peter
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra