Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread
Author: KATinChicagoland Three stars, 500 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 120794  
Subject: Re: Roth versus Traditional IRA Date: 1/31/1998 6:10 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Lemuel presents an interesting analysis. FWIW, here are my comments.

The principal benefit of the Roth IRA is the ability to have a greater number of dollars compounding tax-free for your benefit. If you assume the tax rate at the back end will be 15%, then 15% of the dollars in a traditional IRA are compounding for the benefit of the government. In a Roth, *all* of the tax-free compounding is for the benefit of the owner.

Some taxpayers can attain this benefit at little or no cost; for them the Roth is clearly superior to the traditional IRA. For some, there is a significant cost. That is the case in Lemuel's example: to get the advantage of using the Roth IRA, the taxpayer has to give up the benefit of claiming deductions at 28% when the corresponding income will later be taxed at 15%.

The Roth wins out, even in this situation, if the money is left in the Roth long enough. How long is long enough depends on the assumptions you make. In the assumptions made here, I believe the time period is around 20 years but I haven't taken the time to model this so this is an approximation. In that case, the best strategy for Sarah is to contribute to Roth for 10 years or so, then switch to a traditional IRA. (In other words, leave the Roth intact but don't make further contributions to it.) This will produce a better result than using either type over the entire period.

Stepping back from the math, my feeling is that in any long-term situation Roth is likely to win out over a traditional IRA because of its greater flexibility and the possibility that back-end payments from a traditional IRA may end up being taxed at a higher rate than anticipated. This is based on gazing into a very cloudy crystal ball, of course. And the issue is very different when analyzing shorter term situations. In these cases, it may well be possible to predict with reasonable certainty that the traditional IRA is the better choice.

KAT in Chicagoland
www.fairmark.com
Tax Guide for Investors
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
2013 Feste Award Voting Begins!
Who will win the 2013 Feste Award? Vote now for the Fool that most exemplifies the Fool Community mission of Learning Together!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Berkshire Hathaway

Reestablishing the Middle Class
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement