No. of Recommendations: 1
Let's assume X amount of this net worth is *just enough* to throw sufficient yield to cover all living expenses at 80 years old.

I agree that if you cannot handle a loss of even a penny, then you shouldn't be in stocks.

But I thought you were saying that an IUL was good for investing when you don't need the money for many years. That is my understanding of what Ray has been studying. Now you are saying it is for the situation where you need every penny to get enough yield to meet your needs. These are two very different scenarios. Are you saying IUL's are only better than stocks when you need the yield immediately and cannot take any losses, or do you still think IULs beat stocks when you don't need the money for decades?
Print the post  

Announcements

The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement