Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
<< What if the loan IS only secured by the lot adjacent to, and used by, but not platted the same as the residence? Do you think my logic would prevail (deductible), or must it be secured by the building lot and house as implied by Sched A instructions? That is actually the second option in his question. Well, actually the third. The second one is an unsecured loan to buy the lot, which isn't deductible. >>

I don't see how it could be deductible as personal residence interest if the mortgage is secured only by the vacant lot, regardless of the use of that lot. IRC 163(h)(3)(B) and (C) require that the indebtedness be secured by the residence, and I didn't see anything in the regs that would include adjacent lots whose mortgages are not secured by the lot with the home. There might be a ruling somewhere that I'm not aware of, but absent that it looks to me like it wouldn't qualify.

Phil Marti
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.