Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 2
<<But actually all of the health insurance policies I am aware of already ration care. They are all capped with lifetime benefits of $1MM to $1.5MM. They also specify specific maximums for nearly every treatment option. This is rationing. We already have it. We are used to it.

Why should govt insurance be any different?>>



Because government rationing of health care will be entirely different. Rather than a lifetime cap on medical costs covered, government health care should be expected to decide that at age 70 or so, no intensive treatment of pneumonia will be provided, or no access to hip replacement surgery or whatever.

Democrats have been hollering for health care cost containment, and that's what we should expect it to look like in my opinion. You can see that kind of thing happening in Canada and Britain as a matter of routine.



Seattle Pioneer
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement