Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
<<Perhaps this can be further enhanced by using the standard deviation of ROE divided by the average ROE so as to 'size' this value relative to the other stocks being considered.>>
-----------

This dividing would normalize the variation; otherwise a company to an ROE of 10 would have an advantage over a company with an ROE of 30. Some backtesting would let us know, though I suspect the main differentiation would be between cyclical companies and non-cyclicals. (This is just handwaving, you understand....) So the question becomes, does BI get better returns from cyclicals or non-cyclicals?

By the way, the standard deviation divided by the average is called the coefficient of variation, or CV.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement