Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: SeattlePioneer Big funky green star, 20000 posts Top Favorite Fools Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 19224  
Subject: Re: Wharton Biz School looks at Medicare Date: 5/21/2009 12:30 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
<<This conversation reminds me of some friends I had back in my more radical days. They observed that most jobs consist primarily in pushing paper. Moving paper from your in box to your out box. No other contribution. They would have insurance at the top of the list of that sort of thing, but most government, and, indeed, most "jobs" if you examine them closely spend an inordinate amount of "work" time moving paper. They felt that most real goods and services are provided by a very small fraction of the “work” force. The others are the work farce. Seen in this light, there is room for some of the drones we have. They aren’t likely to produce any valuable work in any case, so shrug them off.
>>


Sorry, but this is an absurd prejudice.

A general principle of the law is that "a workman is worthy of his hire." Most jobs produce useful goods or services or they are or should be eliminated. But whether that involves pushing paper or not isn't relevent.

At one time I worked as a customer service rep for a utility company, dealing with questions customers had with their bills and arranging to have the gas service turned on or off. Just pushing paper.

But suppose there was no one there to arrange for the gas service to be turned on? You'd have customers with no heat who want to pay for service and employees available to do "real" work by turning on the gas, but with no idea who wanted the gas turned on. Would eliminating that paper pusher be useful?

Or how about the person who has a question about their gas bill? Should they just be expected to pay it whether it's right or wrong because we don't want to employ paper pushers?

Eliminate jobs that don't produce useful services ---- but a prejudice against jobs that involve pushing paper is absurd.



Seattle Pioneer
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement