Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: gurdison Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 19409  
Subject: Re: Question For Other Retired Fools Date: 6/7/2002 6:53 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 2
<we were/are well diversified, and have made a couple of decisions lately that (including INTC today) make us feel better about things.

It's a disservice to our FA to blame him for everything, when we are also responsible for what has happened to us...but we are taking a much more proactive approach to finances now.>


I think it is very helpful to post your questions here. There are very few of us who have not had a serious stumble or two along the way. My big one was LU (I know I have a lot of company with that one!). While some may say why cry over spilled milk, I think it is very valuable to go over our mistakes. If we can be objective about it, we can possibly avoid making them again.

I question just how diversifed you were with a 50% drop in your portfoilo. Some people thought they were diversified by having 5 different mutual funds. If they were all agressive growth funds they were wrong. Even funds that sounded like they had different goals had many of the same growth stocks in them. Many fund managers tried to goose their returns this way. It actually worked for awhile, but made for a steeper slide on the down side.

It is good that you want to take responsibility for your mistakes. However, I think you are letting your FA off the hook too easily. Since you stated that you knew nothing about investments, it was even more imperative for the FA to sit down and make sure you were all on the same page at the beginning. He should have clearly established what your risk tolerance was, your LT goals and how you would get there. It may sound counter intuitive, but I think your initial success actually shows just how bad a job your FA did.

The S&P index has a beta of 1.0. It is the standard by which volatility is measured. INTC has a beta of 1.7, which means it is 70 percent more volatile than the index. By contrast many stocks in the asset class of REITs have betas between 0.1 and 0.2, meaning that they are 80-90% LESS volatile than the S&P. Also REITs provide a very stable flow of income to their shareholders, which can be important to retireees whether they retire early or not. They can also provide some meaningful diversification to a portfolio. Has your FA ever discussed them with you or suggested you add them to your holdings? That may be a question you want to add to your list for your next meeting.


BRG

Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Post of the Day:
Saul's Investing Discussions

Why Did I Buy a Bunch of PFIE Today?
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement