UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: WendyBG Big gold star, 5000 posts Top Favorite Fools Top Recommended Fools Feste Award Winner! Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 886271  
Subject: Re: OT: Medicare covers skilled home care Date: 2/22/2013 12:29 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
<While most of us would probably want to stay in our own homes for as long as possible, I think in the next 20 years as the large baby boomer population reaches the high scale of the elderly years, we're going to see that the rest of society cannot afford maintaining so many others to live in homes they no longer can do so without dependence on others. >

This issue is the most challenging facing the U.S., Europe, China and Japan over the next 30 years.

With so many elders and a smaller younger cohort, who will take care of the elders? Who will pay for their care? Especially those who do not have family caregivers?

The U.S. has designed a system where emergency rooms must treat all comers, regardless of ability to pay. This is the most expensive type of care.

Nursing home care is very expensive, though less expensive than hospital.

Assisted living is less expensive than nursing homes.

Living at home, with some help (dependent on others for major tasks such as shopping, cooking and housecleaning, but still able to do personal care such as taking a shower) is less expensive than assisted living.

The longer they can stay in the least expensive domicile, the less they will cost society.

Millions of elderly people (most of them women, many of them poor) will not have family to care for them. Most, if not all, will eventually need some kind of assistance.

Should they be allowed to die? If not, what is the most economical way to keep them alive? The most economical way is to purchase the least amount of assistance commensurate with their needs.

Medicare skilled home care actually saves money because it maintains stability at home. If the person does not have the care, they can have a health crisis that will require expensive emergency care, often followed by expensive hospital stays and expensive rehabilitation.

Once society makes the commitment to keep people alive, the most economical way is by maintenance in place.

I am not disagreeing with you. I'm just pointing out that the fundamental choice is life and death...and everything flows from there.

Many societies in history chose to save resources by abandoning or even killing and eating their elders.


Wendy
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Post of the Day:
Value Hounds

Considerable Headwinds for Profire Energy?
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement