No. of Recommendations: 2
"Who knows what kind of irrevocable harm this has caused," Maddow said, adding that confidential sources would probably question speaking to the AP again, after knowing that the Justice Department obtained the news organization's phone records.

Maddow said that while a senator, Obama supported a federal shield law and co-sponsored 2007 legislation that was eventually killed by a Republican filibuster. Once he became president, the only actions Obama took surrounding federal shield law legislation was to limit that protection when it came to issues of national security.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 30
Congratulations.. you've just proven that a liberal commentator is not a slavish drone.

She was pilloried and called stupid by the right this morning for explaining how the Benghazi kefluffel is without merit.

And now she's being praised by the right for expressing a different sort of view on the AP case.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
"Who knows what kind of irrevocable harm this has caused," Maddow said, adding that confidential sources would probably question speaking to the AP again, after knowing that the Justice Department obtained the news organization's phone records.

Maddow said that while a senator, Obama supported a federal shield law and co-sponsored 2007 legislation that was eventually killed by a Republican filibuster. Once he became president, the only actions Obama took surrounding federal shield law legislation was to limit that protection when it came to issues of national security.


Maddow means this kind of damage:

1. She's mad Obama got caught
2. It means all those crazy right wingers who say the government is too big and too powerful are actually right.

On 2, she and her ilk over at MSNBC do NOTHING but label anyone to the right of Marx as crazy, racist and stupid. It's a whole lot easier to debate someone when you can just dismiss them right from the get-go as a loser and then you can proceed to ridicule them via ad homimem.

But guess what? Obama just blew away so many of the left's narratives they've been building up...now Maddow has to go out and actually mount a defense of the indefensible. Given that she lacks the skills or the IQ that's a daunting challenge.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 4
Maddow means this kind of damage:

You guys would have nothing without your decoder rings.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Stop lynching Maddow.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
You guys would have nothing without your decoder rings.

*Chuckle*, this from the guy that posted the fact that most members of his own party can't find Benghazi on a map.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"Maddow said that while a senator, Obama supported a federal shield law and co-sponsored 2007 legislation that was eventually killed by a Republican filibuster. Once he became president, the only actions Obama took surrounding federal shield law legislation was to limit that protection when it came to issues of national security.
"

In both cases, the federal shield law would not have stopped this.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Maddow means this kind of damage:

1. She's mad Obama got caught


She's not the only one. I can't find the link now (grrr!) but one of the liberal reporters (I know, doesn't narrow it down) was whining yesterday that the real tragedy in all of this is that now 0bama will never be the President he could have/should have been. He'll be mired in scandals and the eeeevil GOP will have absolutely no reason to ever work with him. It's just so terrible!

I'm so distraught... this jumping around and smiling is all for show I swear!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
*Chuckle*, this from the guy that posted the fact that most members of his own party can't find Benghazi on a map.
_______________________________

You are kidding right?

Most members of his party can't find Ban Ghazi in the phone book!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Most members of his party can't find Ban Ghazi in the phone book!

Ban Who?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Obama-Cheney, 2012

JediG
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
You guys would have nothing without your decoder rings.


__________________________

Meanwhile you get your talking points direct from dem headquarters on your Dick Tracy 2-way radio wrist watch....
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1

She was pilloried and called stupid by the right this morning for explaining how the Benghazi kefluffel is without merit.


Ummm, she never did that. She basically ignored the evidence, skimmed past all the issues and called Republicans names. That's fine if you're a graduate of the buffy school of rants, but hardly sufficient for real people.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
She was pilloried and called stupid by the right this morning for explaining how the Benghazi kefluffel is without merit.

Ummm, she never did that. She basically ignored the evidence, skimmed past all the issues and called Republicans names. That's fine if you're a graduate of the buffy school of rants, but hardly sufficient for real people.

She called Republicans "names", huh? The worst I saw in that article was mentioning "conspiracy theorists", which is absolutely true... and it's hardly up to the standard you set Here's what you've called her today:


"full of crap"
"a dishonest liar."
"idiotic"
"stupid"

As is so often the case, you look in the mirror and then confuse that image with the person you are insulting.

Same goes for your "ignoring the evidence" and "skimming past the evidence".
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Failure. I, unlike her, have presented my case.

You're grumpy because Maddow has nothing but some hand waving. I'll remind you that AG Holder is still in contempt of Congress. For not cooperating during this "non scandal". That's a federal crim, obstructing congress, btw. If Obama had nothing to hide, why the stonewalling?

While you're answering that one, you and Rachel can answer the following:

Hicks told Hillary! at 2AM that night there was no protest. Why change the talking points?
In fact, the FBI said it was mainline AQ (it's in the emails you claim show nothing). Why change the talking points?
Why send Obama out to the UN and why have Hillary! cut the Pakistan commercial if it wasn't about the video?
The Sixth Fleet has been in the Med since WW I or something. Where'd they go?
If there was to be no Sixth Fleet in the med, how come there was no backup plan for air assets in North Africa?
How come political hacks like Rhodes and Nuland were directing the response?
How come Hillary! doesn't appear in the emails?

You can start there. Then you can answer this one:

How come there no emails before 9/14?

Thanks for posting my list of Maddow insults. Please add Marxist lapdog, left wing hack, partisan idiot mouthpiece and intellectually overrated talking head to your list.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
How come there no emails before 9/14?

Because the request for a response did not come before then.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
In fact, the FBI said it was mainline AQ (it's in the emails you claim show nothing). Why change the talking points?

Because the CIA was claiming that it wasn't.

Ever suffered through a report cobbled together by a committee?

I thought not.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
It's GREAT the media has been intimidated and it's GREAT that most on the PA Left haven't taken exception.

This way in the future, when President Liz Cheney or George P Bush want to send you people into some war for Saudi and Exxon Oil, reporters won't question and scrutinize it as much. (The press was less active in the lead up to Iraq. That was such a good thing right?)

Eventually when the Feds form that agency to "assist" you Sheeple with how to invest your retirement funds, and Goldman Sachs and their slave Treasury Seceretary need your money in investment XYZ for dubious reasons, they'll coerce you Sheeple into it, and the media, your watchdog won't say much about it.

This will contribute to....
DECLINE!!!

UNRAVEL!!!!

DESERVED!!!!

I love Obama and Holder more and more. I'm upset they can't have a 3rd term.

If anyone disagrees with me they hate government and Obama and they are racist.

Obama and Holder have stuck it to you people more than ever. I thought Bush/Cheney got you people good....but Obama/Holder are doing things with more long lasting effects.

Stripping the Sheeple of rights.

I love it!

Obama 2012

JediG
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Congratulations.. you've just proven that a liberal commentator is not a slavish drone...at least when she discerns that she herself might be targeted for similar treatment in the future.
Print the post Back To Top
Advertisement