UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread
Author: telegraph Big funky green star, 20000 posts Top Recommended Fools Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 61932  
Subject: Re: cahs for clunkers - disaster of a program Date: 1/11/2013 11:58 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
mark:"If you trust that 1850 gallons are used to make an average new car (I have no idea). "

It takes the ENERGY equivalent of 1850 gallons of gas. SInce much of that energy is electricity......from coal..it pollutes even worse than gasoline when burned. From the environment standpoint, you are needlessly spewing extra CO2 into the air.

--------


mark:"And use the stated mpg gains in the report (from 15.8 to 25) and not the minimal required gains in the law (4 mpg better than the old car), which is a massive difference by the way."

Only if you take the 'highway miles'...which most folks don't do for their daily commute. Those first five miles is usually pretty miserable no matter what kind of car you have until it warms up.


-------


mark:" Then you end up with the following (quick google search showed average mileage is anywhere from 10k to 15k per year, and 20k was mentioned in one article):

10,000 miles driven per year --> 8 year break even point"

That assumes a 10 mpg increase...... and most folks don't break even since they have traded away a car that likely had higher resale value in the market......unless it was a broken down wreck, barely able to move in which case the taxpayer got snookered.


And of course, you forgot to include the 'cost of money' , ie interest - which was, what at the time? 6 or 8% or higher for a car loan? That took the payback to way over 10 years.

As for the environment, 1850 gallons of energy was spewed out NOW.....advancing the creation of CO2....which would not be broken even for over 8 years.......and by then, likely half of those cars would be off the road - dead, crashed, stolen, or worn out. From an ecological standpoint, you'd lose coming and going

The only ones who 'won' were the car companies, government motors, and of course, the unions and their fat pension and health benefit plans. It was a bailout for them.


t.


------
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread

Announcements

Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Heads Up, Real Estate Investors
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement