Stocks K / Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (KKD) Add This Board To Your Favorites
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: dwade Three stars, 500 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore)
Number: of 10399
Subject: Re: KREM Prospectus Info Date: 4/6/00 2:54 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
4) Also, on page 10 of the prospectus is this statement that I don't quite understand, but it doesn't sound good. "You will experience an immediate and substantial dilution if you purchase common stock in this offering." The prospectus then goes on to explain that existing shareholders, in addition to a cash distribution of $2.39 per share, will receive an immediate dilution of $11.50 per share to new investors. (Does anyone know what this means?)

I partially understand it. I've probably mangled some details but this should basically be on track:

I searched the prospectus for the word "dilution", and part of what it is saying is that pre-IPO there were 9.5 million shares, and there are book value/share calculations that will be instantly inaccurate after the IPO when they create 3 million more shares -- although on the plus side the company gets the cash from the IPO which adds to the book value. Also, in any future offering obviously there will be more dilution.

The $11.50 figure relates to the above -- if you take $19 as the IPO price (which it wasn't) and subtract out the book value you're paying $11.50 over book.

The cash from the IPO is where the $2.39 comes in -- the book value for existing shares goes up by $2.39 because of the influx of cash.

The cash distribution is actually different from the $2.39 -- under uses for the IPO it says $7 million goes to existing shareholders as part of an earlier reorganization deal, which ammounts to less than a dollar per share.

Anyway, all in all it's nothing terrible.

My biggest problem with the IPO (other than the price) is that the point seems to have been to generate the $7 million, pay off some debts, and do some remodeling of existing stores. It's not going to contribute to the growth of the company in any real way.

Doug


Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post    
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

2009 Feste Award Nominations Opened!
Check the post to see how to nominate a worthy candidate for the 2009 Feste Awards, honoring outstanding contributors to the Fool Community!

Inside Fool HQ Blog
Keep up with the latest news and functionality releases.

Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?

Facebook Fool Fan Club
Be a fan of the Fool over on Facebook!

Post of the Day: Macro Economics
Not Impressed with Tax Break

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.

Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.

Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.

Stock Folders: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z