Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Might want to go back and read that whole link....

I was indeed talking about the way I've known it to be and didn't realize the SEC started trying to better regulate it in 2008. But in reading the article, I don't see where much has changed.

Perhaps if we changed 'is' for 'should be' it would be accurate.

"the float 'should be' the portion of shares available for shorting."

The control activities are all conceptual and theoretical and not strong in practice.

When someone sells a share short, the broker does not identify specifically which share was borrowed from where. "Available" only means they are out there somewhere. No one has to 'prove' where the shares are coming from. So, a lot of different brokers executing a lot of different short sales 'can' exceed float. Not that it happens often, but it happens. (No, it 'shouldn't' but the regulation and matching of short and available shares one-to-one is only theoretical/conceptual.)

Though, I guess it matters not at all to DDD. Just don't see it happening.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement