mkraft writes (in part):Is there any reason to decide to recharacterize a Roth 'conversion' but *not* a Roth 'contribution'?I reply:I can think of at least two scenarios where this makes sense. First, the income of taxpayers who are married filing jointly may have unexpectedly exceeded the $100,000 limit for conversions while remaining below the $150,000 start of the phase-our range for contributions. Second, the contributions may be non-deductible if made to a traditional IRA (in which case the Roth is a no-brainer), while the converted funds (perhaps having begun life in a 401(k)) may trigger a large and unwanted tax liability. --Bob
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar<