Okay folks,I thought before we begin my NJTA experiment, I would share with you a little about me and my investment philosophy. First off, I should tell you that I don't think that the system I developed (NJTA, for NukeJohn Technical Analysis) is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I'm sure there are many other systems out there that are much better, but it is a relatively straightforward system and one that takes the emotions out of buying and selling stocks (if it is possible to do that). The system keeps you from making some of the mistakes I have made in the past (like trying to catch the falling knife). It is a structured approach to investing that only allows you to buy at certain points...and it forces you to sell at certain points. Sometimes those points are small losses, sometimes they are small gains...and occasionally they are very large gains (I like these the best)...but in no case do you have large losses...because my maximum stop loss point is 14% from my original purchase price and it is usually 8%, 10%, or 12%. The maximum initial investment I would ever make on a single stock is 10% of my portfolio(and that would be very rare)...so with a 12% stop loss...the maximum I could ever lose of my portfolio on any single transaction is typically 1.2%. I am a big fan of the classic Jesse Livermore books (see me reading list in my profile)...and I now like Livermore's philosophy to "test the waters" first...so on a typical transaction, my first buy point is usually about 3% of my portfolio. If the stock confirms my belief and rises (in the case of long positions)...then I would add to my holdings. I am not opposed to more additions even if a stock has passed 10% of my portfolio value...but I raise my trailing stops along the way to keep a winning position from ever turning into a losing position. When you can catch a stock like TASR for example (see chart below) and keep adding to your position as the stock continues to rise...that is when you can make a killing.http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=TASR&t=2y&l=off&z=l&q=l&p=e50&a=m26-12-9,v,r14&c=Take a look at the above chart for TASR for a few minutes. Using NJTA...we would have bought TASR around May 13, 2003 at an adjusted price of approximately $1.50...and we would have added more along the way at various points on the climb up...and we would have gotten out in April of 2004 in the high 30's (probably around 38). We would have made many times our money on our investment or more than a "twentybagger" in Peter Lynch terminology. It doesn't take but 1 or 2 TASR-type investments to greatly skew the returns in your favor.Because I come from a Physics background...I tend to believe that a body in motion tends to remain in motion until acted upon by an outside force. That means that stocks going up (especially on higher trading volume)...tend to keep going up...and that stocks falling...tend to keep falling. But when they change direction and we own them...we have to have a sell strategy built in to the system to protect us. I am not a market timer...so I believe that in general it is best to long the best stocks and short the weakest stocks at the same time. In other words, if the market is strong and rising...I still want to have short positions in a few stocks (hopefully stocks that are performing poorly). If the market is weak and falling (like it was in from April 2000 to Nov 2001), I would want to have more short positions than long positions, but I would still have some long positions. Typically, I don't want to have more than 15 total positions. My ratios of long to short positions will always vary depending upon the trend of the general markets. I would never want to be more than 80% long...and I would never want to be more than 70% short. I know some of you here don't "believe" in shorting (or buying puts for that matter)...but believe me...if you want to compete with the professionals you have to be willing to play both sides of the market. Take for example the catastrophic occurrance of 9/11. It was tragic for loss of life above eevrything else, but for a moment I want to look at what happened to the markets. If you were 100% long at that point....your portfolio would have been decimated...but if you were 70% long and 30% short...and you had stops set on all your positions (then your long positions would have been stopped out (when the markets reopened), but your shorts would have saved your portfolio. No one knows ahead of time when something "spooks" the markets (accounting scandals like Enron and Worldcom come to mind), but if you have some short positions, then you are "protected" somewhat. It's not easy to be long the best performing stocks and short the worst performing stocks at the same time, but if you can come close to this goal...you'll always be a successful investor.As for myself, I'm 48 years old with a BS degree in Physics and an MBA with a Marketing emphasis and I work in the nuclear industry. My background is in nuclear safeguards and as a result of 9/11 I am involved in Homeland Security applications, specifically working with various government agencies to prevent a Radiological Dispersion Device (dirty bomb) or a small tactical Nuclear Device (like a Russian suitcase nuclear device) from ever entering our country. It is challenging work and something I take very seriously. I have been an investor for over 25 years...and I did quite well in the 90's as I'm sure most of you did who were invested in high tech like me. I have experimented with virtually every investment technique that I know of, from LTBH using FA only...to pure TA. I have been a value investor, a momentum investor, a day trader, a swing trader, an options trader, and I've experimented with Mechanical investing, CANSLIM, Rule Makers, Rule Breakers, using Gorilla Game techniques, etc. etc. The only thing I haven't done is play around with commodoties..and I have never traded futures. I was very unhappy with the performance of my portfolio in 2000 and 2001...and I was determined to develop a methodology that prevented that from happening ever again. So I embarked on a mission...and I read over 100 investing books...I experimented with a lot of different theories on investing. I prefer not to discuss my past successes or market returns, but I am doing this as a live experiment so you can jusge for yourselves with real data. There are a lot of "Charlatons" out there that could post they got an "average annual rate of return of 80% from 1999-2004"...and unless you saw the realtime results for yourselves...you should never ever believe them. That's why we're doing a realtime experiment.What we are about to embark on is what I now believe to be the best approach to investing that I have seen...because it works in both bull or bear markets and it takes the emotions out of investing. Trust me...this is the biggest hurdle to overcome. The NJTA system forces you to practice good money management techniques. It also spots stocks that are being accumlulated or distributed...before the "behind the scenes news" hits the public. Okay guys...get ready for some fun over the next few months. I'll do my best to post at least daily (sometimes several times a day), but due to travel, firewall, and other situations....I may miss a day or two.Best Regards,NukeJohn
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat