Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
My thinking is that there is little downside. I think the premium is thin which might indicate an upside. On the other hand, ES is represented by GS and Skadden Arps while ECP is represented by Morgan Stanley and Lantham and Watkins which means they are both packing serious heat.

I would guess this means they are comfortable with their process and their ability to defend the price. All this means, IMO, is that there should be little downside and possible/but not likely upside.

I'm sitting tight for now in hopes that maybe someone else sees good value for a competitive bid. Too bad as I thought there was much more significant upside to this puppy.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement