|
Recommendations: 0
Nick, with all due respect I think it would be a bad choice to rely on cash advances to cover an emergency. Typically the interest rates on cash advances are near 19% and it could result in one quickly falling into deep debt.
You have to look at probabilities. There's less than a 1% chance that over the next three months both people will lose their jobs and have to tap in to a 19% cash advance line. But if they don't pay off their credit card debt, there's a 100% chance they'll have to pay 9% interest. Would you rather have a 100% chance of paying me $900 or a 1% chance of paying me $1900?
I think the e-fund, like dollar cost averaging, is sometimes misunderstood and blindly followed. Yes, a cash buffer is a good idea in case of emergency. But if, for example, you're laid off, ask your self if some of the following might apply to you:
-You'll get serverence -You'll get unemployment -You can liquidate your taxable assets as needed -You'll get a bigger tax refund since your withholding was based on a full year of employment -Your spouse will still be employed -You'll be able to find a new job
And keep in mind the cost of an e-fund. A $6,000 e-fund invested at 10% for 30 years is worth over $100,000.
Nick
|
|
|
Announcements
|