No. of Recommendations: 1
Two mantras that I have run into repeatedly here and elsewhere seem to contradict each other. One says that past performance is no guarantee of future results, and the other says that investing in the stock market will bring you returns of roughly 11% annually. If the 11% figure is based on past performance, why do so many seem to treat the expected average return from stock investing as a given? I know this is probably a stupid question, but I'd like to hear some thoughts on this apparent contradiction. Thanks.
-Chester (bothered by apparent contradictions since 1912) :)
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.