Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: TMFTwitty Big funky green star, 20000 posts Old School Fool CAPS All Star Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 51  
Subject: Pay More for Payless? Date: 5/11/2004 2:50 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Pay More for Payless?

By Dave Marino-Nachison
May 11, 2004

Last time a Fool took a close look at cut-price shoe retailer Payless ShoeSource (NYSE: PSS), the take wasn't pretty: "The results," said Bill Mann in examining the company's fiscal Q4 and 2003 (ended January 31) financial report, "were dismal." Later this week, we'll get an idea whether things are improving: The Topeka, Kansas-based company is scheduled to report Q1 numbers before Thursday's market open.

Revenues for the quarter, preannounced last week, rose 3.5% year over year to $722 million. Same-store sales improved 2.8%. The company expects to report EPS of between $0.16 and $0.21, quite possibly down from last year's $0.21 -- which were themselves off significantly from the $0.35 reported two years ago. (It looks even worse if you consider that the company's share count is significantly lower this year than in 2003 or 2002.)

Payless has a ways to go before it reaches its stated goal of becoming "the merchandise authority for value-priced footwear and accessories." Management is working to better select merchandise, better marketing, better service and better store experience -- but must carefully balance operational improvement with the cost controls that will maintain profit margins.

This is especially true given that the company has not had a good run of years. Revenues have fallen steadily during the last four full years. That's hurt profits, as have rising costs and expenses. Same-store sales have declined. Poor merchandising has bloated inventory levels.

And so there's work, aplenty, to do. Interestingly, however, investors have found early returns a good fit: The company's shares are performing well -- and outpacing the S&P 500 -- in early 2004.

Check out the Fool community by signing up for a 30-day free trial. We offer discussion boards on anything and everything.

Fool contributor Dave Marino-Nachison doesn't own any of the companies in this article.

Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Post of the Day:
Value Hounds

Not Cheering the Shire Deal
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement