Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
I ran across an interesting way to beat taxes on an inheritance at the moneypaper website

to paraphrase the article:

Suppose you pay grandma when she babysits, up to $2000 a year. She opens a Roth IRA with junior as a beneficiary. If she lives 15 yrs, the $30000 invested at a tame 10% (their figures, we Fools could easily double the return) would be worth 112,000.

Upon her death, junior inherits the IRA tax free, then begins to take out the mandatory withdrawls, based on his life expectancy, 1/60th would be approx $1800 the first year.

If the Roth continues to invest it will be worth $2.2 million, and requires junior to take a withdrawl of $220,000 at age 70. Assuming only 10% growth...

Please read the complete article, but this seems like an utterly Foolish way to insure your children's retirement.

Can anyone see any downside to this?
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.