Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
Perhaps I should rephrase my question..What is the definition of a line item veto.

The ability to veto specific portions of a bill without vetoing the whole thing.


Thats what I thought, so what would be so wrong with a constitutional amendment allowing line item veto, and revoting on the altered bill?


In my opinion, nothing. But I'm not the Supreme Court. They think it does harm to the seperation of powers. I don't agree with them on Roe v. Wade either. ;~)

Those add ons are often the way they get people on the fence or on the other side to vote for the bill, a lot of times without them the bills wouldn't get out of Congress. This isn't ideal but as unworkable as Congress is now it would be even worse if they had to vote on every issue seperately, that's why they committees.

That is what I have been told repeatedly, so I will demonstrate that I am not only a Fool, but a fool. In my opinion if a bill cant pass on it's own merits, perhaps it shouldnt. Same for the add ons. In fact, perhaps some bills shouldnt even come up for discussion.


I agree, for the most part. I was just explaining.

Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement