UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread
Author: Wavelength One star, 50 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 76418  
Subject: Re: Roth IRA Contriubtions & Conversions Date: 3/5/1999 4:27 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
ph00lish asked:

<<< Looking for answers!! I have read a lot of data but still confused as to the better road to travel. Have a 100K in a traditional IRA. I am 59 and expect to work another 5years. Currently in 15% tax bracket and will in all likely hood remain there( unless one of you kind souls out there can endow me).Two part question, going forward should my 2k contribution be Roth or traditional and should I convert the existing IRA over to a Roth? I will need to use 15k of the IRA to make the converstion but there would not be an early withdrawal penalty. Hope some fool can help. thanks >>>

TMFPixy gave his usual excellent response. I would add a few things to this however. First, if you converted the entire IRA in one year, you would no longer be in the 15% tax bracket for that year, and would probably need significantly more than $15K to pay the taxes. It doesn't make sense to let the conversion put you in a higher tax bracket than you expect to be upon withdrawal of the IRA. You do not need to convert the entire amount however. If you do convert, the best way to go would be to determine the maximum amount you could add to your current income each year and still stay in the 15% marginal tax bracket, and convert only that amount each year.
As to future contributions, as Pixy pointed out, taxwise it's essentially a wash if you remain in the same tax bracket. I would still go with the Roth, however. First off, I feel that for most people you get more 'bang for the buck' with the Roth. The statement above about it being a wash is only true if you invest the tax savings you get for having a deductable IRA in an investment equivalent to the IRA. I feel strongly that the majority of people fail to do this, causing the Trad. IRA to lose out to the Roth in the long run. Second, the Roth has some excellent features beyond the tax free accumulation of earnings. It does not have the same age limits as the traditional IRA wrt how old you can be and still contribute, or when you must begin manditory withdrawal from your IRA. The Roth is in general much more flexible. I therefore would tend to recommend a Roth over a traditional IRA for all future contributions, for someone in your situation.

Wavelength
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread

Announcements

The Retire Early Home Page
Discussion on accelerating retirement day.
Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Looking at Currency Ratios
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement