No. of Recommendations: 0

The answer is yes. More precisely, your benefit (adjusted for inflation which is another issue) at age 62 in 2006 will be less than a person electing to take Social Security in 1999 at age 62, with the same income history. You can read about the details at which I find very helpful. Also, there's a good synopsis in the World Almanac and Book of Facts. I've got the 1997 edition and it starts on p. 708 there.

Don't take it all that personally, it's demographics.
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.