Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
Phil: You hold the not unreasonable opinion that medicaid planning is unethical. I am sure others hold the same opinion but let me offer another opinion. Currently if you have cancer and need $200,000 worth of care medicare pays. If you develop Alzheimer's and need $200,000 worth of care medicaire will not pay. Why does one disease qualify and not another. Wealthy Americans hire expensive tax attornies to help pass assets down to the next generation without paying one penny in taxes. Why should all the tax breaks belong to the rich.

Presently nursing home care runs around $70,000 per year. If a middle class American requires such care for even 5 years that would cost them $350,000. How many families can afford such payments. Currently I say take advantage of the laws the way they are written. If they remove this possibility from middle class Americans, they should be fair and remove the tax breaks from the extremely wealthy as well.

I wrote this post to see if anyone else was in this position. I have been doing my research and think I understand Medicaid trusts better than before and just wanted to see who else had been using one.

Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.