Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
I fully aware that the IRS has always said & courts have upheld that PLR's are in fact private and only pertain to the facts & circumstances of the filing taxpayer.

However, there are many sections of the code where NO rules, regulations, GCM's, notices, TCM's exist; but a material number of PLR's do exist from which it is possible to extract "theory of interpretation".

In this circumstance, is anyone aware of a case or ruling that does allow what I will call "extraction of principle" from one or more PLR's to be done & further to be binding on the IRS? Or mybe it would be better said, a case or ruling that prohibits (probably on the basis of "public policy") that the IRS can not take a position on a taxpayer in direct contradiction of the "principles" of previuosly issued PLR's.

Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.