Providing a security force adequate to deal with Benghazi type events would be very expensive and, of course, would only get used, very rarely. And, even then, it would sometimes be insufficient even then and would be massive excess most of the time, even when used. B:I don't think your comrade is helping your case.He is essentially saying that its open season on ambassadors in unstable countries!"Very expensive" to protect our American lives......not worth it right???The US has never pulled staff from an embassy right????This is only gonna get worse.......you can run but you cannot hide......despite repeating the same old tired misinformation.Benghazi could have been prevented.......that is a fact.Obama chose not to defend it.There is evidence that Obama had warnings and chose to ignore them.There is evidence that Obama deliberately misled us on what transpired afterwards.Colin Powell once said to Bush......."if you break it, you own it".Obama specifically and directly overthrew Khadafi. Look at the situation in Libya for pete sake! He broke it and now he owns it.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra