Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 2
Put people to work under government programs similar to the Roosevelt's Civilian Conservation Corps.

Which would need to be paid by government, which would need revenues to pay for it, but for which revenues will be reduced because fewer people are paying income tax (since they have no income).

Think about it...if all those people really become unnecessary you could round them all up and shoot them, and it would have negligible effect on the economy. They're, in effect, dead weight. How do we deal with that (since shooting them is probably a bad idea!). Raise taxes on all the productive people to pay for them? At some point the burden will be too much. Without some paradigm shift, such as going from agriculture to manufacturing - then manufacturing to technology, we're going to have a lot of really angry/disenfranchised/desperate people. That's not a recipe for anything good.

I'm all for helping someone who has stumbled. But perpetual support just isn't practical, and is not something you could sell to most people.

1poorguy
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement