" Similarly, political debates (although filled with beliefs and personal values) also become ultimately testable via the march of history. I might claim we need to go to war to stop the use of weapons of mass destruction, but if ultimately no such weapons are found, my claim loses credibility."^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Folks use the same approach to argue about "wars on poverty"where poverty increases at the end of the day.The argument does not hold water as there are reasons totake steps to help the poor - just as there are reasons togo to war.But evangelism is integral to several faiths - some tend moretoward "believe this or we shall smite thee" or "act thisway or we shall stone thee" or "talk about things this way orwe shall call thee bad names and not allow you to pass thisgrade".Faith in political approaches - with few exceptions - has also proven themselves remarkable failures. Faith in scienceis fine - but science does not decide policy. People decidepolicy - and despite DNA mapping and behavioral sciences,people tend to fall outside the scientific and logical- to ask questions that physics cannot really answer - and to have wants and needs and desires and dreams that go beyond scientific analyses and logic.Howie52I think that this is a good thing.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra