No. of Recommendations: 1
"68" IS a done deal, I've believed that for quite awhile.

It proves that SS was a semi-scam in that it was designed for people to pay into most of their lives, yet only benefit from a FEW years when they croak after age 65.

My beef: Let some people control their money.

Objection: "Some people are morons! They'll spend it and then we'll have mass poverty like the 3rd world".

So my proposal:

Keep forcing people and their employers to pay FICA status quo.

At age "40", they would have to demonstrate that they've been responsible with savings, nest egg, investments, etc. . IF THEY prove that, let them invest the full 12%.....again with rules about how much money can go in one investment, etc.

People would have a stake in their own life, and odds are, do better for themselves and the system.

JediG
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement