No. of Recommendations: 1
"Is the above due to the possibility of something happening to me and then he'd have to cover his own insurance? As I said, the difference would only be about $25 of going it on his name vs. adding him to my policy."

Partially. Since you are employed, and can put your husband on your insurance, the difference at present is indeed small. If you were to leave the work force and no longer had that option, you will find the rates for an individual trying to get health insurance are much higher. So his being an independent contractor serves to commit you to continuing to work even if your husband's employment actually makes enough work for both of you.

The extra FICO can indeed be a factor that swings the decision.
I've been happy with my decision to go back to being an employee. Less freedom in some respects, but I'm also accumulating a pension--which would never occur as an independant contractor, and there are also the little matters of sick time and vacation days, that don't appear in your calculations.

Best wishes, Chris
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.