Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
"It continues the fiction that there is a real one-to-one correspondance between what you
pay in ("My Contributions") and what you get, or deserve to get, out"

No, it doesn't. It only assumes that I can determine my contribution. (I can and so can SSA and the IRS, because my benefits are calculated based on my contributions). It also asummes that I can determine my benefit. (I can and so can the SSA and the IRS.)

In every other area you pay taxes on the excess of what you get out over what you put in. Why not SS?
The problem that I see with my proposal is that at some point your benefits would be reduced after several (many?) years at a higher level. This will not go over too well.

I have a hunch that the 85% tax level now in effect is less than what I propose. But after all it simple, fair, and easy to understand.

Joe Varga
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.