"The suit was over the IRS's ability to regulate all tax preparers"I read that the suit was that the IRS has no legal authority to make up such a regulation; that it's up to Congress, which did NOT do so. "Granted, a great many of these preparers do a fine job. But the IRS has been out to improve the quality of tax preparers for a number of years. This mandatory program was their attempt at enforcing some standards on the industry. "Somehow I doubt their real concern is quality. That's like belieeving the FDA's concern is drug safety ;)Probably more like a fee raising endeavor or some such tactic. I doubt CPA's have any higher quality than non-CPA's. Not in my experience, nor in the articles I have read. I've known a few CPA's who hardly knew basic bookkeeping rules. I would trust Turbo Tax before taking their word for anything. Also, every year there was a test done of a random sample of CPA's whereby they were given a fake scenario on which to prepare a tax return. The results were WIDELY different. One of them, I remember, ranged from a bottom line of 150K tax due to 50K refund. Nice quality control!RB
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Rat