Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
"Your first paragraph is correct, and my only guess at an explanation is that the lawyer meant to say (and perhaps said) that he could leave $675,000 to his two sons. He can; that's $337,500 for each son. He could not have meant he could leave $675,000 to Son #1 and another $675,000 to son #2 and so could his wife, all free from gift/estate tax; "

This was one of those TV roundtable "discussions" (i.e., yelling matches). I'm pretty sure the anti- estate tax repeal discussant really did believe the $675,000 amount was per child. I was surprised the repeal proponents didn't jump down his throat (I would have) for basing his argument on incorrect facts. I suppose they are so busy trying to shout past each other, they don't even hear an opening to deal an opponent a knock-out punch. Serves me right for watching (I never do, but there was an ad during the NCAA).
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement